tonekids.com

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Failure


In Age of High-Tech, Are Americans Losing Touch with DIY Skills

E-mail Print PDF

In Age of High-Tech, Are Americans Losing Touch with DIY Skills?

Read a call to action for bringing back our handymen, then debate PM's list of 25 skills every man should know!
Published in the October 2007 issue.







Science fiction author Robert A. Heinlein once wrote: “A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program acomputer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects.” 

That’s a tall order. Although I can only do some of those things, I approve of the principle. Now adays, though, we’re specializing more. A popular Internet essay is titled: “I Can’t Do One-Quarter of the Things My Father Can.” Are hands-on skills—building things, fixing things, operating machines and so on—really in decline? 

I think so. SAT scores provide a record of academic performance, but there’s no equivalent archive for tracking handiness. There is, however, a lot of anecdotal evidence that what used to be taken for granted as ordinary mechanical skills now amounts to something unusual. When I recently wrote on my Web site about the importance of giving kids hands-on toys, a reader e-mailed: “Boy, can I second [your point about] the lack of basic skills in adults. I volunteer with Habitat for Humanity here in Los Angeles. The volunteers who come out frequently can’t do something as basic as using a tape measure. ... Many of my Saturdays are effectively clinics on how to pound a nail.” 

Even the simplest of automotive tasks, changing a tire, seems to be beyond the ken of many people. According to AAA, nearly 4 million motorists requested roadside assistance last year—for flat tires. 

And just look at the Popular Mechanics Boy Mechanic books to see the kinds of skills that boys and teenagers were once routinely expected to possess. These books (which PM published in the early 20th century and recently reissued) assumed that young readers would be prepared to construct a fully rigged ice boat, a toy steam engine, or—I’m not kidding—a homebuilt “Bearcat” roadster powered by a motorcycle engine. 

It’s hard to imagine too many teenagers tackling projects of that magnitude these days. To be fair, young people today are likely to have skills that earlier generations never dreamed of—building Web sites, say, or editing digital movies. But manipulating pixels and working with physical materials aren’t quite the same thing. 

Does this matter? And if people are becoming less mechanically handy, is that so bad? I think so—and not just because specialization is for insects. Continued...

 

Car Design Flaws - If It’s Already Broke, Why Do I Have to Fix It? - Popular Mechanics

E-mail Print PDF

In his biweekly rant, PM’s senior automotive editor and Saturday Mechanic wonders out loud why car engineers don’t think like car mechanics—and how that’s making for more everyday headaches on the road than you deserve.

Published on: November 6, 2007 


Too much of what we design and manufacture today is broken from the get-go. I can finesse or work around a lot of improperly designed user interfaces and hardware, but I shouldn’t have to—and neither should you. On more occasions than I care to remember, I’ve had to make or modify a lot of tools in my shop to take something apart and/or put it back together, often in the wee hours of the morning. A lot of people without the skills or time to make tools and parts are totally adrift when confronted with mechanical tasks like these. Too many people have abandoned working on their own cars, and I’d bet a lot of that comes from seeing the way things are engineered. Tasks that should be simple are instead very complicated because someone didn’t think through the consequences of their design. Let’s take something as simple as spark-plug access. 

 

The Fire at the Brown's Ferry Nuclear Power Station

E-mail Print PDF

How a candle caused a nuclear emergency...

At noon on March 22, 1975, both Units 1 and 2 at the Brown's Ferry plant in Alabama were operating at full power, delivering 2200 megawatts of electricity to the Tennessee Valley Authority.

Just below the plant's control room, two electricians were trying to seal air leaks in the cable spreading room, where the electrical cables that control the two reactors are separated and routed through different tunnels to the reactor buildings. They were using strips of spongy foam rubber to seal the leaks. They were also using candles to determine whether or not the leaks had been successfully plugged -- by observing how the flame was affected by escaping air.

The electrical engineer put the candle too close to the foam rubber, and it burst into flame.

The resulting fire, which disabled a large number of engineered safety systems at the plant, including the entire emergency core cooling system (ECCS) on Unit 1, and almost resulted in a boiloff/meltdown accident, demonstrates the vulnerability of nuclear plants to "single failure" events and human fallibility.

 

Last Updated on Monday, 17 August 2009 04:46
 

Elektroschutz in 132 Bildern

E-mail Print PDF
User Rating: / 1
PoorBest 
Courtesy of Bre Pettis. This may be of interest to the EE in all of us....


Click on the picture for more
 

The System Implodes: The 10 Worst Corporations of 2008

E-mail Print PDF
2008 marks the 20th anniversary of Multinational Monitor’s annual list of the 10 Worst Corporations of the year.

In the 20 years that we’ve published our annual list, we’ve covered corporate villains, scoundrels, criminals and miscreants. We’ve reported on some really bad stuff — from Exxon’s Valdez spill to Union Carbide and Dow’s effort to avoid responsibility for the Bhopal disaster; from oil companies coddling dictators (including Chevron and CNPC, both profiled this year) to a bank (Riggs) providing financial services for Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet; from oil and auto companies threatening the future of the planet by blocking efforts to address climate change to duplicitous tobacco companies marketing cigarettes around the world by associating their product with images of freedom, sports, youthful energy and good health.

But we’ve never had a year like 2008.

The financial crisis first gripping Wall Street and now spreading rapidly throughout the world is, in many ways, emblematic of the worst of the corporate-dominated political and economic system that we aim to expose with our annual 10 Worst list. Here is how.
 
  • «
  •  Start 
  •  Prev 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  3 
  •  4 
  •  5 
  •  6 
  •  7 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
  • »


Page 1 of 7